SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19475

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
JAMAL – Appellant
Versus
MAHESH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU, SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH, SMT.ARYA RAGHUNATH, SHRI.KARUKAPADATH WAZIM BABU, SMT.P.LAKSHMI, SMT.AYSHA E.M., SHRI.HASHIM K.M., SHRI.ABUASIL A.K., SMT.HANIYA NAFIZA V.S., SHRI.M.I.INSAF MOOPPAN, SHRI.RISHI VINCENT, SHRI.MANU KRISHNA S.K.
For the Respondents: SHRI.SHAJI CHIRAYATH, SMT.JIJI M. VARKEY, SMT.M.K.SAFEELA BEEVI, SMT.SAVITHA GANAPATHIYATAN, SRI.M.M.SHAJAHAN

Table of Content
1. complaint regarding delay in issuing certified copies. (Para 1)
2. court allows time extension for challenging order. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

This original petition has been filed complaining that certified copy of the order in I.A.No.3 of 2026 had not yet been issued.

2. When the case is taken up today, it is submitted that a copy has been received. The counsel prayed for a breathing time to challenge the order. This original petition is closed, extending the interim order till 23.03.2026.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top