SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19485

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
RAGAM PUTHENMADATHIL CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.E.ADITHYAN, SMT.TREESA MANJILA, SMT.MEERA RAMESH
For the Respondents: SMT. NIMA JACAOB, GP, SRI. SANTHOSH P. PODUVAL, SC, THRISSUR CORPORATION

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the respondents that, in view of the interim order passed on 20.10.2022, directing the 2nd respondent to register the marriage of the petitioners without compelling the physical presence of the 2nd petitioner, and permitting the presence of the petitioner through video conferencing, the marriage has already been registered.

In the light of the above, nothing survives for consideration and accordingly this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top