SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19490

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
M/S BRAND BAZAR LIFESTYLE – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10474 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR, SMT.G.REMADEVI, SMT.S.SUJINI, SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN, SMT.HARIMA HARIHARAN, SHRI.RAJATH R NATH, SHRI.DHEERAJ SASIDHARAN, SHRI.SREE HARIDEV, SHRI.JOHN PHILIP M, SHRI.BONEY D THOMAS
For the Respondents: SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SC, SHRI.AKHIL SURESH, SC

The court mandated the timely consideration of pending representations by executive bodies to ensure compliance with legal obligations.

Headnote:The petitioner, a proprietorship concern, was licensed to display advertisements on 1,899 buses of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation for five years but faced losses due to only 1,399 buses being available. The court ordered a decision on the pending representation by the petitioner (Ext.P21) within two months. Key issues included the revenue loss and demand for owed payments. The court emphasized adherence to law in handling the representation.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a proprietorship concern engaged in the business of advertisement. The petitioner was awarded license to display advertisement on 1,899 Fast Passenger buses of the 1st respondent Corporation for a period of five years. However, the respondents made available only 1,399 buses for displaying the advertisement and according to the petitioner, consequent to the same, petitioner sustained serious revenue loss. Apart from the above, the petitioner also has a case that, certain amounts are to be receivable from the respondents as well. In such circumstances, the petitioner submitted Ext.P21 representation highlighting its grievances, which is now pending before the 2nd respondent. The limited relief sought by the petitioner is to direct the 2nd respondent to take a decision on the same within a time frame.

After hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 2nd respondent shall take up Ext.P21 and appropriate orders thereon shall be passed in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top