SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19515

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
T.D. RAVINDRANATHAN KARTHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SIBI THOMAS JACOB, SRI.V.S.NOWSHAD, SRI.V.P.REMESH, SHRI.BIGU K.G., SHRI.P.DEEPAK (SR.)
For the Respondents: SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR, SHRI.HALVI K.S., SHRI.M.P.RAMNATH, SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR, SRI.ARUN MATHEW VADAKKAN, SMT.P.R.REENA, SHRI.BEPIN PAUL, SMT.S.SANDHYA, SRI.SHALU VARGHESE, SMT.UMA R.KAMATH, SRI.K.J.SEBASTIAN, SHRI.P.RAJESH (KOTTAKKAL), SEI.M.VARGHESE VARGHESE, SRI.ANTONY THARIAN, SMT.SHANTHI JOHN, SMT.V.SHYLAJA, SMT.STEFFY V.J., SMT.ANCY JOY, SMT.LEEJI A.S., SHRI.AROKIA JAMES

Table of Content
1. petitioner expired, case became infructuous. (Para 1)
2. dismissal of writ petition as infructuous. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

It is submitted that the writ petitioner expired on

15.09.2025.

2. Since admittedly the right to sue does not survive this writ petition has become infructuous.

Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

However, the contentions raised in this writ petition are left open. Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE SMF

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top