Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
T.K.ABDUL RAHIM @ T.K.ABDU RAHIM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of the case established. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. contention of the appellant versus affirmation of prosecution. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. issues formulated related to conviction and sentencing. (Para 9) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence and conviction rationale. (Para 10 , 11 , 13) |
| 5. final verdict modifies sentence while affirming conviction. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of March, 2026 The 4th accused in S.C. No.326/2013 on the the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Kasaragod, has filed this appeal, under Section 378 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [hereinafter referred as ‘Cr.P.C.’ for short], challenging the conviction and sentence imposed against him as per the judgment dated 08.04.2016. The State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor is arrayed as the respondent herein.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail. Carefully gone through the verdict under challenge and the records of the Sessions Court.
3. Parties in this appeal shall be referred as ‘accused’ and ‘prosecution’, hereafter.
4. The prosecution allegation is that, accused Nos.1 and 2 stabbed PW1 using a k
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
