SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19609

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
KERALA GOOSEBERRY HILLS AYURVEDA HEALTH, RESORT PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 45034 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ALIAS M.CHERIAN, SHRI.K.M.RAPHY, SHRI.BRISTO S PARIYARAM, SMT.MINNU DARWIN, SMT.RESHMA RAJESH, SHRI.SAVIO AUGUSTINE
For the Respondents: SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN

The court ensures prompt consideration of applications for exemption under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, emphasizing the importance of hearing affected parties.

Headnote:Under Section 81(3) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, the petitioners sought exemption for 3 acres of plantation property. The court directed the 2nd respondent to consider the application swiftly, ensuring all affected parties are heard (paragraphs 1-2). The court's determination emphasized the need for prompt compliance to protect petitioners' rights (paragraph 1). The final ruling allows the writ petition as outlined (final conclusion).

Table of Content
1. petitioners sought exemption under the kerala land reforms act. (Para 1)
2. the court directed consideration of the application ensuring all affected parties are heard. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

Ext.P1 is a petition preferred by the petitioners seeking exemption under Section 81 (3) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act . It is the petitioner's contention that the subject property having an extent of 3 acres is part of the plantation and hence liable to be exempted under (3). Petitioners seek Ext.P1 to be considered by the 2nd respondent, in accordance with law, expeditiously.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P1 application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner will produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent, for compliance. Needless to say that, petitioner, as also, any other affected person, will be afforded with an opportunity of being heard before taking a call in Ext.P1.

This Writ Petition will stand allowed, as indicated above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top