Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
THE MANAGER, MAYANAD AUP SCHOOL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners contest the denial of sanctioned teaching posts due to bureaucratic delays. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. petitioners argue for retrospective effect of sanctioned posts as per established regulations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court orders reconsideration of denied appointments recognizing prior sanctioned entitlements. (Para 9 , 10) |
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 12th day of March, 2026 The 1st petitioner is the Manager of an Aided Primary School and the 2nd petitioner is a Teacher appointed in an additional division with effect from
01.06.2022.
2. The petitioners state that during the year
2023-2024, the School was sanctioned with one additional post of UPST and LPST, but the revised Staff Fixation Order was issued only on 23.09.2024, as per Ext.P7 during the midst of the academic year. The 1st petitioner-Manager executed declaration so as to comply with 1:1 ratio in terms of Rule 7(2) of Chapter XXI of KER .
3. However, due to the delay in sanctioning the post as per Ext.P7 for the year 2023-2024, it was functioning by clubbing together and the 3rd respondent erroneously reported that the 3rd post was not functioning and the claim for approval from 01.06.2023 was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
