Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.V.N.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI.JITHESH MENON, SC, SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC

The court allowed the restoration of the writ petition based on justifying reasons in the miscellaneous jurisdiction case.

Headnote:The judgment considered the provisions surrounding miscellaneous jurisdiction cases, allowing the restoration of the writ petition. The key facts reveal challenged orders from financial institutions and tax authorities. The court concluded that the reasons in the MJC justified the relief sought as denoted in the writ proceeding. The court consequently restored the writ to the file for further hearing.

ORDER

After considering the reasons mentioned in this MJC, it is allowed and the writ petition is restored into file.

Post the writ petition after two weeks.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

JUDGE scs

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :