Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
JOSEPH ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of legal representation for the petitioners. (Para 1) |
| 2. claim of possession and the conflict regarding land ownership. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. no documents presented by the panchayat to support its claim. (Para 5) |
| 4. court directs decision-making on the application by the 6th respondent. (Para 6) |
J U D G M E N T
Heard Sri. K.S. Bharathan, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. Santhosh P. Poduval, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.7 and 8, and Sri. T.P. Sajan, the learned Special Government Pleader (Forest).
2. The 1st petitioner is stated to be in possession of 65 cents of forest land in Sy. No. 825/P of Thekkumkara Village, Thalappilly Taluk. According to the 1st petitioner, since he has been continuously carrying out various agricultural operations on the said extent of land, he submitted Ext. P1 application under the Kerala Land Assignment Act before the 6th respondent seeking assignment of the property.
3. However, the said application has not been disposed of, primarily due to the claim raised by the 7th respondent Panchayat, which contends that the property forms part of its Asset Register. The Panchayat has also taken the stand th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
