SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 20125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.B. SNEHALATHA, J
M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ALINA.S.JOE @ ALEENA – Respondent
MACA NO. 3231 OF 2024 | OPMV NO.1072 OF 2016



Important Points

The withdrawal of an appeal is permissible when a formal memo is submitted to the court.

Subject

Civil Law - Motor Accident Claims

Headnote

Statute Analysis: Under relevant provisions of the Motor Accident Claims Act, the appeal is subject to withdrawal procedures. Facts of the Case: The appellant requested permission to withdraw their appeal in a memo filed on 04.03.2026. Findings of the Court: The court allowed the request for withdrawal.

Issues: Whether the appeal filed can be dismissed as withdrawn.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the withdrawal as the appellant submitted a formal memo, recognizing its validity.

Result: Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD, SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY
For the Respondents: SHRI.NITHEESH.M, SHRI.K.E.HADHIK JAZAR, SHRI.MOHAMMED NIHAD

JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal and filed a memo dated 04.03.2026 to that effect. The said memo is recorded Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top