SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 20150

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
UMADEVI T.C, VRINDA T.C, MEGHA RAMESHAN T.C, RAVEENDRAN P.V – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) KANNUR, SUB REGISTRAR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41793 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SREEHARI, SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN, SHRI.HAMZA A.V.
For the Respondents: SRI. K. M. FAISAL, GP

Co-ownership rights can validate partition deed registration despite not meeting family definitions under the applicable statute.

Headnote:In this case, the Court examined the validity of a partition deed's registration under Section 2(k) of the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959, considering the petitioners' claims to co-ownership. The Court concluded that while the petitioners did not meet the definition of 'family', they were entitled to have the partition deed registered. The Court emphasized that co-ownership rights justify the registration, irrespective of 'family' status. In the result, the earlier order was set aside and directions were issued for the registration of the deed with appropriate stamp duty assessments.

Table of Content
1. facts regarding the property and ownership rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's observation on the applicability of the law. (Para 5 , 6)
3. conclusion regarding registration of the partition deed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 5th day of March, 2026 The averments are that by virtue of a Registered Partition Deed No.1251/I/ 2019 of SRO Ancharakkandi dated 13/06/2019 an extent of 5.87 Ares of land with all improvements therein situated in Re-Sy.No.57/4 A2 of Maniyoor Village, Taliparamba Taluk, Kannur District was allotted to the share of one Rameshan.P. The petitioner Nos 1 to 4 herein are respectively the wife, children and brother of the aforesaid Rameshan.P.

2. The aforesaid Rameshan.P has died intestate, and the property standing in his name covered under Exhibit P1 was inherited to his legal heirs namely his wife, children and his mother Ammalu Amma. In the meanwhile, Rameshan’s mother has transferred her right , title and interest over the undivided 1/4 share to his son Raveendran P.V, 4th petitioner herein, with respect to the aforesaid property which she has inherited from her deceased son. The said conveyance was by a Registered Sale Deed No.404/1/2024 of SRO Ancharakkandi dated 21/02/2024.

3. Based on the above facts, the petitioners herein are the co-owners and are in joint possession and enjoyment of the property having an extent of 5.87 Ares of land with all improvements therein situated in Re-Sy.No.57/4 A2 of Maniyoor Village, Taliparamba Taluk, Kannur District. The petitioners being the co-owners of the said property are also paying land tax with respect to the said property.

4. Since the petitioners did not intend to continue with the joint ownership and possession of the said property, it was decided to execute a Partition Deed between them, by dividing the property into two shares namely A & B schedule, whereby the Partition Deed Schedule Item No.A (4.86 Ares of land with all improvements therein situated in Re-Sy.No.57/4 A2 of Maniyoor Village, was allotted to the petitioner Nos.1 to 3 herein and, the Partition Deed Schedule Item No.B (0.52 Ares of land with all improvements therein situated in ReSy.No.57/4 A2 of Maniyoor Village, was allotted to the 4th petitioner herein. With the above stated intention of severance of the undivided right of share over the subject matter of the property and to divide the subject matter property by metes and bounds, an instrument for partition under 2(k) of the Kerala Stamp Act ,1959, was executed as per under Article 42(b) of the Schedule to the Kerala Stamp Act ,1959 and submitted the same before the 2nd respondent for registration under Section 17 (1) of the Registration Act , 1908, in a stamp paper worth value of Rs.500 and remitted the stamp duty of Rs.2,130/- along with the registration fee of Rs.995/-. The petitioners were also provided with an Online Token Registration with Token No. T9345434 by the 2nd respondent.

5. The 1st respondent thereafter has passed an order dated 14/10/2025 with Order No.DRGKNR/3141/2025- G1, by invoking Section 31 of the Kerala Stamp Act ,1969 holding that the parties to the instrument sought to be registered does not qualify to be a ‘family’ and the said instrument does not come under the purview of Section 2 (k) of the Kerala Stamp Act ,1969. Further, the parties thereto does not have co-ownership over the property, with respect to which the Partition Deed is executed and for which the registration is sought is liable to pay the stamp duty in terms of Article 21 of the Schedule to the Kerala Stamp Act ,1959 and in terms of the same, directed the petitioners to pay the stamp duty at the rate of 8% for the total market value of Rs.3,66,700/- amounting to Rs.29,336/- It was also ordered that the petitioner shall pay the deficit balance stamp duty of Rs.27,206/- after deducting Rs.2,130/- already paid as the stamp duty.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent.

7. Section 2(k) of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top