IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
M/S.TYFORD ESTATE – Appellant
Versus
P.P.THAMPI – Respondent
RFA NO. 517 OF 2006
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to appear results in dismissal for non-prosecution. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's ruling on the appeal dismissal. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the appellant today. There was no representation for the appellant on 03.03.2026 as well.
2. Despite repeated directions from this Court, no steps have been taken.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.