Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
M/S.TYFORD ESTATE – Appellant
Versus
P.P.THAMPI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to appear results in dismissal for non-prosecution. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's ruling on the appeal dismissal. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the appellant today. There was no representation for the appellant on 03.03.2026 as well.
2. Despite repeated directions from this Court, no steps have been taken.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
