Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
P.V. Mathew – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timely processing of land applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. clarification on administrative obligations under claim. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court ruling on klu application processing. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" a) Issue a declaration that the lands included in Exhibit P2 application is eligible for consideration for permission under Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, in view of the law declared by the Full Bench of this Hon’ble Court in Jacob Boban (Mukthar Ali) case reported in 2025 (1) KLT 804.
b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondent to finalise Exhibit P2 application filed on 01.08.2017 under the provisions of KLU Order itself, without insisting to remit fee based on Exhibit P3.
c) Dispense the petitioner from producing the English translation of the vernacular documents produced in the writ petition.
d) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. Petitioner, the owner in possession of an extent of
12.40 Ares in re-survey No. 236/10-2 and 01.50 Ares in 236/3 in Block No.19 in Ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
