Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 20421

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
M/s.CRYSTAL TRADERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE TAX OFFICER, SECOND CIRCLE, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13217 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MEERA V.MENON, SMT.K.KRISHNA
For the Respondents: SMT.RESHMITHA R CHANDRAN, SR.G.P

This judgment confirms procedural fairness in GST assessment revisions, ensuring remand for fresh disposal after setting aside previous determinations.

Headnote:The writ petition concerns a dispute regarding a GST assessment. The judgment references the final order in the appeal, which set aside the assessment and remanded for fresh disposal. The court found no further orders necessary in light of this direction. The outcome of the writ petition is the closure without further intervention.

JUDGMENT

Today when the matter came up for consideration the learned Government Pleader made available a copy of the final order passed in the appeal in which Ext.P3 interim order, which is impugned in this writ petition, was passed. As per the said order, the assessment is set aside and the matter is remanded for fresh disposal. In such circumstances, no further orders are to be passed in this writ petition.

Accordingly, this writ petition is closed in the light of the above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 20421

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JM/s.CRYSTAL TRADERS – AppellantVersusTHE STATE TAX OFFICER, SECOND CIRCLE, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD – RespondentWP(C) NO. 13217 OF 2020

This judgment confirms procedural fairness in GST assessment revisions, ensuring remand for fresh disposal after setting aside previous determinations.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
M/s.CRYSTAL TRADERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE TAX OFFICER, SECOND CIRCLE, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13217 OF 2020