Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
NELLIMOODU UDAYAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner contested the rejection of discharge in a forgery and conspiracy case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. counsel presented arguments about the petitioner's alleged innocence and professional duty. (Para 4) |
| 3. evidence indicates significant involvement of the petitioner in procuring forged documents. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The third accused in C.C No.678/2012 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram, has filed this revision petition against the order dated 24.04.2019 of that court in C.M.P No.372/2019, rejecting his request for discharge from the criminal prosecution in that case. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 120B , 465, 468, 471, 417, 473 and 419 r/w Section 34 I.P.C.
2. The case against the petitioner is summarised as follows:
The petitioner is a practising lawyer at Thiruvananthapuram. He entered into a criminal conspiracy with the other four accused in this case, and forged bogus title deeds, tax receipts, solvency certificates and identity cards for accused Nos.1 and 2, and submitted those records on 23.12.2004, for releasing the second accused in Crime No.372/2004 of Fort Police Stat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
