SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 20531

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ANEESH P. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.RAGHUL SUDHEESH, SMT.J.LAKSHMI, SMT.AMBILY T. VENU, SMT.RACHEL MARY JACOB, SMT.ATHULYA VAISHNAVI, SMT.KALLYANI MENON
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Table of Content
1. filing of a bail application under section 482. (Para 1)
2. absconding charge sheet renders bail application infructuous. (Para 2)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-

arrest bail.

2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Public Prosecutor that absconding charge sheet has already been submitted. Hence, the prayer sought in the bail application has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the application for pre-arrest bail is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top