IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SUBHASH BABU P.V. – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pending applications for permit consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court directs expeditious consideration. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner’s applications for renewal of permit as well as replacement of vehicle are pending consideration before the respondent. In the meantime, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 application for temporary permit. The grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P2 application is not so far considered by the respondent. Accordingly, the petitioner filed this writ petition for the following relief :-
“ i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondent to grant Temporary Permit to the petitioner on the route Kozhikode (Palayam Bus Stand) - Edavannappara in respect of petitioner’s Stage Carriage KL 10/Y 5472 in place of KL 10/ T 6613 by considering Ext.P2 application most expeditiously at any rate within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice.” [sic]
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the submissions made across the Bar, there will be a direction
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.