IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
GEETHA RAJENDRAN, NARAYANI K.V, SHYAMALA V, PRASEETHA T.V, KARTHYAYANI, KARTHIKA, JANAKI B, SHYAMALA T.V – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KASARAGOD DISTRICT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24203 OF 2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the issuance of a toddy shop license in a residential area. (Para 1) |
| 2. order for consideration of representation within specified timeframe. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by the license granted by the 2nd respondent to run Toddy shop No.22 in the building owned by the 7th respondent, the petitioners have preferred Ext.P2 representation before the 2nd respondent. The petitioners state that the toddy shop is situated in a residential area and that the licence has been issued contrary to the provisions of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002. Accordingly, the petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 6 to ensure that no toddy shop is run in the building bearing No.12/317 of Pullur Periya Grama Panchayat.
2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made across the Bar, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent or to the competent official among the respondents as authorized by the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2 and pass appropriate orders, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners in a representative capacity and to the licensee of the shop, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.