IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
KURIAN P.JOHN – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. purchase and background of property. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's observations and considerations. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has purchased certain extent of properties pursuant to Ext.P1 sale deed of the year 2005. The petitioner contends that the afore extent of properties covered by Ext.P1 sale deed - 11.23 Ares in Sy.No.110 in Block No.7 of Kakkanad Village, is covered by the proceedings under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order (for short ‘KLU Order’) in the name of the predecessor in interest from whom the petitioner purchased the property. Ext.P4 order has been obtained by the predecessor in interest as early as in the year 1996. According to the petitioner, the afore extent of property was converted on the basis of proceedings at Ext.P4 then and there. However, when the petitioner came to realise that the afore extent of property was included in the data bank, he filed an application in Form 5 under the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act , 2008. Pursuant to the directions of this Court in W.P.(C) No.30539 of 2021 dated 10.03.2022 (Ext.P16), the Revenue Divisional Officer issue
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.