SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 20793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
I-FAST (INSTITUTE OF FIRE & SAFETY TECHNOLOGY) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41941 OF 2025



Important Points

The court allows a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition for filing a fresh challenge against an earlier order.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

Statute Analysis: The judgment concerns the withdrawal of a writ petition pertaining to licensing under transport regulations. Facts of the Case: The petitioner sought permission to withdraw their earlier filed writ petition to challenge an order dated 10.03.2026.

Findings of Court:
The court permitted the withdrawal under the stated conditions.

Issues: The court framed the issue of whether the petitioner could withdraw their writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that withdrawal was permissible based on the counsel's request.

Result: With the said liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SACHIN RAMESH, SRI. ARAVIND T. RAMESH
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S APPU - GP

Table of Content
1. withdrawal of writ petition (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

The learned Government Pleader has handed over a copy of the order dated 10.03.2026 passed pursuant to the order of this Court dated

10.02.2026.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to challenge the said order by filing a fresh writ petition.

With the said liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top