IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOHN VALLENTINE – Appellant
Versus
TIME TUITION CENTRE MEKKADU – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10650 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for illegal tuition centre operation relief. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner seeks prompt consideration of representation. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's directive on hearing parties before action. (Para 3) |
| 4. respondent directed to comply with the judgment. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
“(i) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to take appropriate action against the 1st respondent to stop the functioning of the illegal Tuition Centre, within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
(ii) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to take appropriate steps consequent to Exhibit P5.
(iii) This Honourable Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the English translation of vernacular documents as per order. And iv) Pass any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to issue and the petitioner may pray from time to time."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext. P15 within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. The manner in which this Writ Petition is going to be disposed of, no notice is necessary to the 1st respondent. But, if the 1st respondent is aggrieved by any of the directions issued by this Court, the 1st respondent is free to file a review petition before this Court.
4. Since the prayer is only for a consideration of representation by the 2nd respondent, I think that prayer can be allowed on condition that the 2nd respondent will hear the 1st respondent also before taking any action.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd respondent is directed to consider Ext.P15, after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the 1st respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd respondent for compliance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.