CHAMMANADU DESWOM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, KUTHIATHODU P.O, CHERTHALA vs ANILKUMAR S/O PANKAJAKSHA KARTHA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 20959

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
CHAMMANADU DESWOM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, KUTHIATHODU P.O, CHERTHALA – Appellant
Versus
ANILKUMAR S/O PANKAJAKSHA KARTHA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.P.RAMNATH, SHRI.P.RAJESH (KOTTAKKAL), SHRI.BEPIN PAUL, SMT.S.SANDHYA, SRI.SHALU VARGHESE, SMT.UMA R.KAMATH, SRI.K.J.SEBASTIAN, SEI.M.VARGHESE VARGHESE, SRI.ANTONY THARIAN, SMT.SHANTHI JOHN

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up, the counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the original petition with liberty to file fresh petition.

Permission granted. The original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 20959

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R.RAVI, JCHAMMANADU DESWOM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, KUTHIATHODU P.O, CHERTHALA – AppellantVersusANILKUMAR S/O PANKAJAKSHA KARTHA – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
CHAMMANADU DESWOM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, KUTHIATHODU P.O, CHERTHALA – Appellant
Versus
ANILKUMAR S/O PANKAJAKSHA KARTHA – Respondent