Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAJI – Appellant
Versus
SWATHI CHANDRAMOHAN. K.A.S – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 549 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.41351 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.RANJITH C., SRI.V.GANGADHARAN, SHRI.BINJO ANDREWS, SHRI.KIRAN JOHNY, SMT.SHINY GEORGE MEKKATTUKULAM, SHRI.LIBIN P. P., SMT.SEBI S. RAJ, SHRI.JOSBIN THOMAS
For the Respondents: SR GP, SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.RANJITH C., SRI.V.GANGADHARAN, SHRI.BINJO ANDREWS, SHRI.KIRAN JOHNY, SMT.SHINY GEORGE MEKKATTUKULAM, SHRI.LIBIN P. P., SMT.SEBI S. RAJ, SHRI.JOSBIN THOMAS
For the Respondents: SR GP, SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE
Court does not require further direction in contempt case if fee notice is issued.
Headnote:This judgment concerns a contempt of court case
(C) regarding WP
(C) No. 41351 of 2025. The petitioner submitted that a fee notice was issued, making further directions unnecessary. The court concluded that once the fee is paid, the authorized officer will act accordingly. The court dismissed the case with this observation.
JUDGMENT
When this Contempt of Court case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that a fee notice is issued on 04.03.2026. If that be the case, no further direction is necessary in this case. Once the fee is paid, the authorised officer will do the needful to pass consequential orders forthwith.
With the above observation, this Contempt of Court case is closed.
