IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAJI C.D – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 20241 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requested to waive conversion fee. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court examined eligibility based on land area and previous transactions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner's claims were found without merit; fee is required. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition is filed with the following prayers:
“i.) call for the records leading to Exts.P1 and P3 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ order or direction;
ii.) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to process the application of the petitioner for conversion of the land without insisting on payment of the conversion fees and allow the same;
iii.) grant such other and further relief as this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice;
iv.) dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents;”
2. Ext.P1 order is passed by the 1st respondent permitting the petitioner to convert the land. But the petitioner is directed to remit amount of Rs.17,10,720/- being 10% of the fair value. The petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the 4th respondent, but the same was rejected. According to the petitioner, the petitioner need not pay the conversion fee.
Hence this Writ Petition.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. The counsel for the petitioner re-iterated the contentions raised in the Writ Petition. The learned Government Pleader takes me through the counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent. The relevant portion of the counter affidavit is extracted below:
“7. Under Rule 12(9) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Rules 2018, a conversion fee waiver is only applicable for land parcels not exceeding 25 cents. An examination of the previous sale deed confirms that, as of 30.10.2017, the petitioner's land area exceeded limit of 25 cents. Hence, the applicant was ineligible for free conversion pursuant to the Government circular No. REV-P1/338-
REV dated 23.12.2023.
8. The decision was not made on the basis of classification of land in data bank. So this ground is not also maintainable. The land in question has not exceeded 25 cents in area. But the appeal was dismissed because as per the previous title deeds of the property (the previous title deeds of the applied land) shows that the extent exceeds 25 cents as on 30.12.2017. Eventhough the applicant is in possession of less than 25 cents of land as per the Deed No. 950/2024, the status of the land, ie., the area on the cut- off date disqualifles him from free exemption for conversion. The respondent was acted as per law and as per the provisions of the Kerala Paddy Wet Land Act
2008 and subsequent government orders, in the matter.”
5. In the light of the above statements, I think there is no merit in the contentions of the petitioner. The petitioner has to pay the conversion fee.
This Writ Petition is thus dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.