ABDUL RAHUMAN A. vs M/S ALBAIK RESTAURANT & CATERING SERVICES

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
ABDUL RAHUMAN A. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ALBAIK RESTAURANT & CATERING SERVICES – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.SANJAY, SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON, SRI.KIRAN NARAYANAN, SHRI.RESHVAN A., SHRI.MUHAMMED BILAL.V.A, SMT.MEERA R. MENON, SHRI.SAURAV SHAJI
For the Respondents: SHRI.NINEEP K., SRI.C.MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA, SRI.D.ARUN BOSE

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the original petition. Permission is granted and the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R. RAVI, JABDUL RAHUMAN A. – AppellantVersusM/S ALBAIK RESTAURANT & CATERING SERVICES – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
ABDUL RAHUMAN A. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ALBAIK RESTAURANT & CATERING SERVICES – Respondent