Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
ABDUL RAHUMAN A. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ALBAIK RESTAURANT & CATERING SERVICES – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 778 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.SANJAY, SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON, SRI.KIRAN NARAYANAN, SHRI.RESHVAN A., SHRI.MUHAMMED BILAL.V.A, SMT.MEERA R. MENON, SHRI.SAURAV SHAJI
For the Respondents: SHRI.NINEEP K., SRI.C.MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA, SRI.D.ARUN BOSE

The court permits withdrawal of the original petition, dismissing it accordingly.

Headnote:In the context of the original petition marked as OP

(C) No. 778 of 2026, the court allowed the petitioner's request for withdrawal, thereby dismissing the original petition. The court emphasized its permission to withdraw without prejudice to the rights of the parties, following procedural fairness. The conclusion reached is that the original petition has been officially withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the original petition. Permission is granted and the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R. RAVI, JABDUL RAHUMAN A. – AppellantVersusM/S ALBAIK RESTAURANT & CATERING SERVICES – RespondentOP(C) NO. 778 OF 2026

The court permits withdrawal of the original petition, dismissing it accordingly.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
ABDUL RAHUMAN A. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ALBAIK RESTAURANT & CATERING SERVICES – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 778 OF 2026