SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21095

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAJEEV V.S., SOORAJ C.K. – Appellant
Versus
M/S MUTHOOT VEHICLES & ASSETS FINANCE LTD – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 472 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON
For the Respondents: SRI.SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA, SRI.LEEJOY MATHEW.V., SMT.P.R.ROSHNA, SHRI.SIMSAR UL HAQ K.Y, SHRI.ALDIN JOSE M.J., SMT.ATHIRA C.K.

Withdrawal of a criminal petition retains the right to future challenges.

Headnote:The petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted permission to withdraw the Original Petition (Criminal), reserving their right to challenge the proceedings in the future. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty retained to challenge the proceedings later.

Table of Content
1. request for withdrawal of the petition. (Para 1)
2. permission granted to withdraw the petition. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The petitioners seek permission to withdraw this writ petition.

2. The petitioners are granted permission to withdraw the Original Petition (Criminal), reserving their right to challenge the proceedings, if any, in the future.

Accordingly, the Original Petition (Criminal) is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as mentioned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top