Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21095
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAJEEV V.S., SOORAJ C.K. – Appellant
Versus
M/S MUTHOOT VEHICLES & ASSETS FINANCE LTD – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 472 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON
For the Respondents: SRI.SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA, SRI.LEEJOY MATHEW.V., SMT.P.R.ROSHNA, SHRI.SIMSAR UL HAQ K.Y, SHRI.ALDIN JOSE M.J., SMT.ATHIRA C.K.
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON
For the Respondents: SRI.SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA, SRI.LEEJOY MATHEW.V., SMT.P.R.ROSHNA, SHRI.SIMSAR UL HAQ K.Y, SHRI.ALDIN JOSE M.J., SMT.ATHIRA C.K.
Withdrawal of a criminal petition retains the right to future challenges.
Headnote:The petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted permission to withdraw the Original Petition (Criminal), reserving their right to challenge the proceedings in the future. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty retained to challenge the proceedings later.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for withdrawal of the petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. permission granted to withdraw the petition. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners seek permission to withdraw this writ petition.
2. The petitioners are granted permission to withdraw the Original Petition (Criminal), reserving their right to challenge the proceedings, if any, in the future.
Accordingly, the Original Petition (Criminal) is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as mentioned.
