Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NEHRU CHARITABLE TRUST – Appellant
Versus
PONNANI MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner seeks action against an unsafe building. (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel for both parties were heard. (Para 3) |
| 3. municipality's duty under the act justifies action against public safety hazards. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take further steps in furtherance of Ext.P2 notice and demolish the building within such time as may be pleased by this honourable court.
b) Petitioner also prays that this hon’ble court may be pleased to dispense with the translation of the document produced in the vernacular language.
And c) Pass any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to issue and the petitioner may pray from time to time. "
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is a Trust and is represented by it’s Secretary. The petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the 1st respondent to demolish a 100 years old building which is in dilapidated condition. According to the petitioner, the 2nd respondent directed to demolish the building after the inspection made by the overseer by wa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
