IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
M/S. AUCTOR BUSINESS SOLUTIONS – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legality of composite notices for multiple assessment years. (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner challenging Ext.P1 consolidated show cause Notice issued and Ext.P3 order-in-original passed by the 2nd respondent and Ext.P4 notice issued by the 3rd respondent for multiple financial years namely, 2018-19 to 2023-24. The main challenge raised against the sustainability of the same is that, issuance of a composite notice for multiple assessment years was found to be not legally sustainable as per the decisions rendered by this Court in Joint Commissioner (Intelligence & Enforcement) v. M/s. Lakshmi Mobiles Accessories [ 2025 KHC OnLine 149 ] and Tharayil Medicals (M/s.), Thrissur v. Deputy Commissioner, Thrissur [ 2025 KHC OnLine 467 ].
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 2 to 4, I find merits in the said submission, in view of the fact that, such a finding was indeed entered into by the Division Bench of this Court in the decisions referred to above.
In such circumstances, in the light of the principles laid down by this Court in the above referred judgments, a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.