Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
JAIKISH S R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek backdated appointment approval. (Para 1) |
| 2. government pleader's argument on appointment comparisons. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's review on established precedents. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. court affirms legitimacy of previous judgments. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT Dated this the 16th day of March, 2026 The petitioners, who are working as HSST (Junior), have filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the 4th respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioners from the actual date of appointment as in Exts.P2, P2(a), P2(b) and P2(c) appointment orders and to set aside Exts.P3 to the extent approval was granted only with effect from 30.08.2013 and 31.08.2013 respectively. The petitioners submit that the legal issue involved in the writ petition is covered in their favour as per the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) No.4296 of 2026.
2. Government Pleader entered appearance and resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader submitted that the case of the petitioners cannot be compared with the case of the petitioners in W.P.(C).No.4296 of 2026. There are factual differences. However, in the light of Exts.P5 and P6, the issue raised by the petitioners can be re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
