Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
SHEEBA JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for ugc pay scale revisions (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. challenges against pay recovery orders (Para 8 , 12 , 13 , 21) |
| 3. implementation of ugc scheme policies (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 15 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. observations on qualifications of the petitioners (Para 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. court's ruling on pay reassessment legality (Para 22 , 24) |
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The petitioners, who are working as Associate Professors under the Institute of Human Resources Development, are before this Court seeking to quash the proceedings dated 31.01.2023, the order dated 01.06.2007 and their salary pay fixation statements. The petitioners state that they are entitled to pay fixation under AICTE/ UGC Scheme on acceptance of their option as per proceedings dated 21.12.2010 of the IHRD.
2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.5466/2023 holds MSc and MPhil in Mathematics. Pursuant to a notification dated 28.07.1995, the petitioner submitted application for appointment as Lecturer in Mathematics. The petitioner was appointed as Lecturer in the College of Applied Sciences in the pay scale of ₹2060-3200 with effect from 01.09.1998. The petitioner successfully completed her probation
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
