SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21616

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
JOSEPH D'CRUZ @ MOSES – Appellant
Versus
A. PRAJIN BABU – Respondent
CRL.L.P. NO. 141 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.G.SUDHEER, SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN
For the Respondents: SRI. VIPIN NARAYAN A., SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The leave petition must be returned to allow the appellant to file an appeal before the Sessions Court, with exclusion of the petition's pendency period from the limitation calculation.

Headnote:This case involves a criminal leave petition filed under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, following a judgment of acquittal dated 21.12.2024 in C.C No. 1810/2014 for trial under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, 1881. The Court determines that in accordance with the Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran and the decision in Soumya Gopal v. State of Kerala, the leave petition must be returned, allowing for an appeal to be filed before the Sessions Court, exempting the period of this leave from the limitation calculation. The leave petition is returned with liberty to appeal, granting three weeks for such filing.

Table of Content
1. criminal leave petition filed under section 419(4) regarding an acquittal. (Para 1)
2. judicial guidance on filing an appeal following precedence. (Para 2)
3. determination to return the petition with instructions for future appeal. (Para 3)

ORDER

Dated, this the 18th day of March, 2026 This criminal leave petition has been filed under Section 419 (4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, at the instance of the complainant in C.C No. 1810/2014, on the files of the Special Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, for the trial of cases under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881, Thiruvananthapuram, seeking leave of this Court to file appeal challenging the judgment of acquittal in the above case dated

21.12.2024.

2. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran etc., reported in [2025 (4) KHC 189] , which was followed in the decision of this Court in Soumya Gopal v. State of Kerala reported in [2026 KHC Online 24], this leave petition required to be returned to the leave petitioner with liberty to file appeal before the Sessions Court concerned, with the aid of proviso to Section 413 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023.

3. Hence, this leave petition is returned with liberty to file appeal before the Sessions Court concerned. It is made clear that the period of pendency of this Crl.L.P., from 26.03.2025 till date, shall be excluded from calculating the period of limitation for filing appeal before the Sessions Court concerned.

Three weeks' time from today is granted to the leave petitioner to file the appeal before the Sessions Court concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top