SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21685

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUHAMMED SHAFAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1685 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.HAROON RASHEED
For the Respondents: K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

The court held that lack of evidence for continued detention justified bail under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Headnote:The application for bail was filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the accused is alleged to have committed cyber crimes, swindling substantial amounts. The court found no grounds for continued detention due to lack of materials and the applicant's innocence claims. Consequently, bail was granted with specific conditions.

Table of Content
1. bail application under bnss. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. summary of parties' arguments. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.285/2026 of Irinjalakuda Police Station, Thrissur District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 112 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that upon receiving the information that the accused, in furtherance of their common intention to acquire illicit money, were swindling money from the bank accounts of others with the aid of online methods, a search was conducted at their houses and 28 ATM cards, 6 cheque books, 7 passbooks, a machine to count notes and Rs.35,100/- were seized from their house. There are several complaints against the applicant that he had swindled an amount of Rs.45,96,796/- by way of committing cyber crimes.

4. I have heard Sri.Haroon Rasheed A., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

09.03.2026. The investigation is almost over. The mobile phone of the applicant, which is allegedly used for the commission of the offence, has already been seized. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE NP APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 1685 OF 2026 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top