Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. Jayachandran, J
K. Suresh – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners aggrieved by fireworks permission refusals on common grounds. (Para 1) |
| 2. refusals unsustainable per prior judgments; permissions directed with conditions. (Para 2) |
| 3. notify adm; writs allowed as above. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
In all these Writ Petitions, the petitioners are aggrieved by the Orders which are produced at Ext.P8, whereby, the requests of the respective petitioners for permission for the display of fireworks have been refused by the 1st respondent/District Collector. The reasons/grounds stated in Ext.P8 is common to the following effect:
The first is that the petitioners can use only crackers approved by the Chief Controller of Explosives. The second is with respect to the absence of a risk assessment plan and onsite emergency plan, as approved by P.E.S.O. The third is the absence of a permanent magazine. The last reason is with respect to the petitioners’ failure to produce a list of the crackers intended to be used.
2. This Court notice that all these objections are subject matter of the judgments of this Court in various cases, especially those produced at Exts.P10 to P13. For the same set of reasons as narrated in Exts.P10 to P13, Ext.P8 Order
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
