Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
C.SHINOJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on prosecution evidence. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding witness identification flaws. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. observations on trial compliance and prosecution failures. (Para 8) |
| 4. final judgment leading to acquittal. (Para 9) |
O R D E R
The revision petitioner herein is the first accused in C.C No.294/2007 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thalassery. He was convicted by the learned Magistrate for the commission of offence under Sections 341 and 326 I.P.C, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 326 I.P.C, and simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 341 I.P.C. In the appeal filed as Crl.A No.229/2012, the Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Thalassery set aside the conviction and sentence for the offence under I.P.C, and confirmed the conviction and sentence for the offence under I.P.C. Aggrieved by the aforesaid verdict of the Appellate Court, the petitioner is here before this Court with this revision petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.
3. T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
