SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Shanavas Khan – Appellant
Versus
Dental Council of India – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1193 OF 2019|WP(C) NO. 598 OF 2019|WP(C) NO. 856 OF 2019|WP(C) NO. 1161 OF 2019|WP(C) NO. 1361 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.DAISY A.PHILIPOSE, SRI.JAI GEORGE, SRI.THOMAS M.JACOB, SRI.AKHIL K.MADHAV, SRI.T.R.JERRY SEBASTIAN, SRI.V.PRASANTH
For the Respondents: SRI.PRAKASH M.P., SHRI.P.SREEKUMAR, SHRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.), SHRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, SHRI.U.R.HARSHA KUMAR, CGC

Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's submission.

Headnote:First Paragraph: No specific statutes quoted in the judgment. Petitioners, dental students from various colleges affiliated to Kerala University of Health Sciences, challenged actions by Dental Council of India and university regarding BDS course regulations and prior orders. Court found the matters infructuous as submitted by counsel. Second Paragraph: No issues framed by court due to infructuous nature. No ratio decidendi provided as case not adjudicated on merits. Third Paragraph: Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the above Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top