Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Jobin Sebastian, J
ASOKAN S/O.RAGHAVAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to conviction based on evidence and procedural grounds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments focus on reliance on testimonies and possible false implications. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. established importance of injured witness testimony in criminal proceedings. (Para 12 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. modification of sentences while affirming convictions based on evidence. (Para 22 , 23) |
Jobin Sebastian, J.
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Sections 397 and
401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , challenging the judgment dated 26.10.2016 in Crl. Appeal No. 335/2012 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court–I, Thiruvananthapuram, which arose from the judgment dated 23.06.2012 in C.C. No. 653/2007 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Attingal. The revision petitioner herein is the sole accused in the above case.
2. The prosecution case is that on 10.03.2007 at about 3:30 p.m., the accused trespassed into the property of PW2, used abusive language against him, and inflicted injuries, including fracture on various parts of his body, using the blunt portion of a chopper. Thus, the accused is alleged to have committed offences punishable under Section
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
