Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21803

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
M/S. PRESTIGE EDUCATIONAL TRUST – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LTD – Respondent
OP (DRT) NO. 12 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Smt. Nisha George, Sri. George Poonthottam (Sr.)
For the Respondents: Shri. Leo George

The petitioner retains the right to withdraw their petition and seek other legal remedies under the law.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the withdrawal of an original petition (OP (DRT) No. 12 of 2026) by the petitioner, M/S. Prestige Educational Trust, permitting them to pursue other legal remedies. The court noted the petitioner's counsel's request and dismissed the petition accordingly. The ruling emphasizes the right to withdraw and seek alternative remedies as per law.

JUDGMENT

After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this original petition, with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies available to it as per law. With the aforesaid liberty, this original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21803

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JM/S. PRESTIGE EDUCATIONAL TRUST – AppellantVersusHDFC BANK LTD – RespondentOP (DRT) NO. 12 OF 2026

The petitioner retains the right to withdraw their petition and seek other legal remedies under the law.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
M/S. PRESTIGE EDUCATIONAL TRUST – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LTD – Respondent
OP (DRT) NO. 12 OF 2026