IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ANISH U JALAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 11530 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grievances about police conduct require statutory authority intervention. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ petition relief is denied but alternative legal procedures are open. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner seeks for a direction to dispose of Ext.P5 complaint filed before the Director General of Police.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged human right violation, on account of alleged brutal assault by the Assistant Sub Inspector of Police as well as another officer, who were attached to the Women’s Cell, Kollam. Though petitioner has filed a complaint before the 2nd respondent, and seeks for a direction to dispose of the said complaint, I am of the view that, if the petitioner is aggrieved by any conduct of the police officers, the remedy is to approach the statutory authority constituted under the Kerala Police Act , 2011.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. The direction to dispose of the complaint filed before the 2nd respondent cannot be an appropriate remedy. Hence, the said relief claimed by the petitioner in this writ petition is declined. However, the petitioner is at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the statutory authority constituted under law.
Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.