SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21874

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHAFSEER.P.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2624 OF 2026 | L.P NO.7 OF 2019 | S.T NO.299/2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, SRI.PRAJIT RATNAKARAN, SMT.ANJU DONY
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA S.

The court established that a petitioner unable to attend a trial may still seek bail upon surrender and warrant recall, ensuring timely consideration of such applications.

Headnote:This case pertains to a Criminal Miscellaneous Case concerning L.P. No.7/2019 (S.T. No.299/2017), where the petitioner, accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, could not appear on the scheduled date, leading to a non-bailable warrant issuance. The court permits the petitioner to surrender within ten days to seek bail and recall the warrant. The legal principles regarding non-appearance and subsequent remedies are addressed. Ultimately, the court directs the Trial Court to consider applications filed upon surrender on the same day.

Table of Content
1. petitioner accused under nia section 138. (Para 1)
2. petitioner requests to surrender and seek bail. (Para 2)
3. court agrees to consider applications post surrender. (Para 3)

C.S.DIAS, J.

---------------------------------------------

Crl.M.C. No. 2624 of 2026 -----------------------------------------------

Dated this the 24th day of March, 2026 ORDER The petitioner is the accused in L.P. No.7/2019 (S.T.

No.299/2017) on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-V, Kannur, (Trial Court), which is registered on a complaint filed by the 2nd respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act .

2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, the petitioner could not appear before the Trial Court, on the day the complaint was posted for his appearance, due to unavoidable circumstances. The petitioner has learnt that a nonbailable warrant has been issued against him, and the case has been transferred to the Long Pending Register. The petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the Trial Court and get himself enlarged on bail. However, the petitioner is apprehensive that his applications may not be considered on the date of surrender and he may be remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

On a consideration of the facts and materials on record, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, I dispose of the Crl.M.C., by permitting the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within ten days from today and file applications before the Trial Court to get himself enlarged on bail and to recall the nonbailable warrant, after serving advance copies on the Public Prosecutor. If such applications are filed within the prescribed time period, the Trial Court is directed to consider the applications on the very same day the petitioner surrenders before the Trial Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top