SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21883

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
CINI P. ANTO – Appellant
Versus
THE GRAMA PANCHAYAT OF SEETHATHODE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23225 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.Manu Ramachandran
For the Respondents: Sri.K.Janardhana Shenoy, Sri.Abraham Samson

The Grama Panchayat is mandated to take action against unauthorized slaughterhouses as per its resolution.

Headnote:The court examined the petitioner's claim to run a meat stall under the Grama Panchayat's permission, against allegations of unlawfully operated slaughterhouses by the respondents. The Panchayat asserted prior commitment to take action against illegal operations. The petition is disposed of directing responsive action based on earlier resolutions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner awarded right to run meat stall. (Para 1)
2. responses regarding illegal slaughterhouses. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is stated to have been awarded the right to conduct a meat stall in the Panchayat market attached to the 1st respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that as per permission granted by the Panchayat, the petitioner is sourcing the meat by getting the meat slaughtered in a far away place. As against the afore, the complaint of the petitioner is that the party respondents are running unauthorized slaughterhouses, without obtaining any permission from the Grama Panchayat.

2. Heard Sri.Manu Ramachandran, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.K.Janardhana Shenoy, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2, as well as Sri.Abraham Samson, the learned counsel for additional respondents 3 to 8.

3. The learned counsel for the Grama Panchayat would contend that the Panchayat Committee has already decided on 22.08.2023, to initiate action against the illegal slaughtering houses being run as complained by the petitioner in this writ petition.

4. The learned counsel for the party respondents, on the other hand, would point out that the party respondents are not conducting any illegal slaughterhouses as alleged in the writ petition, and that they obtain meat slaughtered from the permitted slaughterhouses.

In view of the afore submissions, this writ petition would stand disposed of, directing the respondent Grama Panchayat to take strict action against any illegal slaughtering of meat in the respondent Grama Panchayat, as decided in the resolution dated

22.08.2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top