SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22078

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
AROOP E.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1646 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.115/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.V. Anoop, Phijo Pradeesh Philip, Junaid V.S
For the Respondents: K.A. Noushad

The court rules on granting pre-arrest bail based on the absence of substantial evidence to substantiate criminal allegations.

Headnote:The application for pre-arrest bail was filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving allegations of cruelty demanding dowry. The court found insufficient evidence to justify the applicant's arrest and granted bail subject to conditions. Issues included the applicant's rights and procedural adherence warranted by the law. The application was allowed with specific bail conditions.

Table of Content
1. application for bail under bnss. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the alleged crime. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments from both sides regarding bail. (Para 5)
4. court conditionally grants bail. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-

arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.115/2026 of Thamarassery Police Station, Kozhikode District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 85, 115(2) and 329(4) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the defacto complainant was subjected to cruelty both physically and mentally by the applicant demanding more dowry.

4. I have heard Sri. P.V. Anoop, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. K.A. Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The applicant is the husband of the victim. The alleged incident took place in the year 2017. Admittedly, there is matrimonial dispute between them. The remaining accused were granted anticipatory bail. The investigation is almost over. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, his custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top