SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22115

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MAHADEVAN A.S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2282 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ADV SHRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA

Revisability of discharge orders; judicial discretion on entertaining applications.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Case challenging an order for discharge. The Court noted that such orders are revisable and declined to entertain the application, indicating the petitioner retains the right to file a revision petition. The Crl.M.C is dismissed but without prejudice to the petitioner's right to appeal. The case underscores the statutory remedies available to a petitioner against dismissal orders.

Table of Content
1. challenging discharge order. (Para 1)
2. court's discretion regarding revisable orders. (Para 2)
3. dismissal without prejudice. (Para 3)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2026 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1948 CRL.MC NO. 2282 OF 2026 CRIME NO.1961/2022 OF Kottayam West Police Station, Kottayam AGAINST THE ORDER DATED IN CRMP 908/2025 IN SC NO.17 OF

2023 OF SPECIAL COURT (NDPS ACT CASES), THODUPUZHA PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3:

MAHADEVAN A.S AGED 25 YEARS ,S/O SIVADASAN, ARIKKATHIL HOUSE, MULAKULAM SOUTH P.O, MULAKULAM KARA, MULAKULAM VILLAGE. KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686001 BY ADV SHRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682031 SR.PP. SMT. SEETHA S.

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

26.03.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R Dated this the 26th day of March, 2026 The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed challenging Annexure A2 order dismissing the application filed by the petitioner for discharge.

2. Indisputably, an order dismissing an application for discharge is revisable.

3. In light of the statutory remedy available to the petitioner, I am not inclined to entertain the Crl.M.C. Hence, the Crl.M.C is dismissed, but without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a revision petition.

The Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the documents to the learned counsel for the petitioner, in accordance with law.

SD/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top