IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
N.P.KUNHIKANNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10529 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO. 12394 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge phone call for arms surrender. (Para 1) |
| 2. surrender orders must follow guidelines and be lawfully issued. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. writ petitions allowed; return of arms directed. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Both these petitioners approached this Court aggrieved by a phone call received from the S.H.O. concerned, calling upon the petitioners to surrender their arms in accord with the guidelines issued by the Election Commission of India (produced at Ext.P2) in W.P.(C).No.12394/2026. This Court notice that the S.H.O. concerned (the 4th respondent in both the cases) cannot mandate surrender of arms through a phone call. Ext.P2 guidelines requires deliberation by the competent Authority on an individual basis, a review and an assessment, whereafter an Order has to be passed calling upon the licence holders to surrender their arms. This Court has considered the issue recently in W.P.(C).No.11762/2026.
2. In the circumstances, it is clarified that the petitioners are not under any obligation to surrender their arms based on phone call by the 4th respondent. The competent Authority in terms of Ext.P2 guidelines will pass necessary Orders, if the petitioners are required to surrender their arms. While passing such Orders, the impact of the judgment in W.P.(C).No.11762/2026 dated 26.03.2026 shall necessarily be considered by the competent Authority and directions, if any, for surrender shall be in strict compliance of Ext.P2 guidelines and its interpretation in the judgment above referred.
3. The learned counsel for the respective petitioners have pointed out that their respective arms have been deposited because of the pressure exerted by the respective S.H.Os. In W.P.(C).No.10529/2026, it was deposited before the 4th respondent and in W.P.(C).No.12394/2026, the same has been deposited before a private armoury, evidenced by Ext.P5 receipt. Inasmuch as the deposit is mandated otherwise than in accordance with law, the 4th respondent in W.P. (C).No.10529/2026 will stand directed to return the arm to the petitioner within a period of two days from today. The learned Government Pleader will give necessary instructions in this regard. Similarly, the private armoury by name ‘Samson Armoury’, which issued Ext.P5 receipt, will also stand directed to return the arm to the petitioner in W.P. (C).No.12394/2026 within two days from today. The 4th respondent/S.H.O. in that case will stand directed to give necessary instruction in this regard to the said private armoury for return of the arm, as directed above.
4. Learned Government Pleader will inform the gist of this judgment to the 4th respondent in both the writ petitions, today itself.
These Writ Petitions will stand allowed as indicated above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.