Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22178
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
RENJITHA P – Appellant
Versus
SHANAVAS S – Respondent
Con.Case(C) No. 3002 of 2025 | WP(C) No. 23529 of 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Poovamulle Parambil Abdulkareem
For the Respondents: K. B. Sony
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Poovamulle Parambil Abdulkareem
For the Respondents: K. B. Sony
The confirmation of compliance with previous orders reserves the petitioner's right to further challenges, emphasizing procedural integrity.
Headnote:Under the provisions applicable to contempt proceedings, the Government Pleader submits that the directions from the previous judgment were complied with. The petitioner retains the right to challenge this compliance order in future proceedings. The case is thus closed. Key issues framed involve entitlement to challenge decisions post-compliance. The ruling reflects adherence to procedural justice and respect for prior judgments.
JUDGMENT
The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submits that the directions in Annexure A1 judgment have been complied with, by passing an order dated 15.03.2026.
If the petitioner is aggrieved by the above said order, it is for the petitioner to challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. Leaving open such right of the petitioner and recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.
