Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22291

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
ABDU RAHIMAN T K – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (ERSTWHILE MDC BANK) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35669 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS, SMT.S.K.SREELAKSHMY
For the Respondents: SRI.GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA

The court ruled the writ petition as infructuous and dismissed it.

Headnote:This judgment addresses WP

(C) NO. 35669 OF 2023. The petitioner, represented by counsel, claimed the writ petition had become infructuous. The court accepted the submission and dismissed the petition. The main issue was whether the petition remained relevant under legal statutes. The court found that no further action was required, leading to the dismissal.

Result: 'this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.'

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. Submission accepted and this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22291

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JABDU RAHIMAN T K – AppellantVersusKERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (ERSTWHILE MDC BANK) – RespondentWP(C) NO. 35669 OF 2023

The court ruled the writ petition as infructuous and dismissed it.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
ABDU RAHIMAN T K – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (ERSTWHILE MDC BANK) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35669 OF 2023