Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
MIDLAND CONTRACTING PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner requests statutory relief based on a letter of acceptance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents argue against the relief due to the code of conduct. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court finds no reason to grant relief and dismisses the petition. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner, a works contractor who was issued with Ext.P2 letter of acceptance in respect of the work covered by Ext.P1 tender notification. The reliefs sought in the writ petition is as follows:
A. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, commanding the Respondent Nos.1 and 2, to permit the Petitioner to execute a formal agreement in terms of Ext.P2, Letter of Acceptance;
B. Declare that the refusal on the part of respondents 1 and 2 to execute agreement citing MCC is illegal and arbitrary.
C. Issue any other appropriate writ, order, or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice;
D. Award the costs of this petition to the petitioner.
E. To dispense with filing of English translation of vernacular documents.
2. Apparently, the writ petition was filed seeking the reliefs as referred to above
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
