JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging, Ext.P3 and P4 orders passed by respondents 2 and 3.

2. According to the petitioners 2^nd petitioner is a chronic kidney patient who is undergoing treatment and he is in emergent need of kidney transplantation. 2^nd petitioner is in good relationship with the husband of the 1^st petitioner for more than seven years. Out of humanitarian consideration, 1^st petitioner voluntarily decided to donate one of her kidneys to the 2^nd petitioner due to the affinity and attachment with the family of the 2^nd petitioner. Pre transplant evaluation was conducted by the hospital and police verification certificate was also obtained. Though the petitioners approached the 3^rd respondent District Level Authorisation Committee for renal transplantation, 3^rd respondent declined the request by passing Ext.P3 order without considering the documents submitted by the petitioners and by ignoring the police verification report. Though the petitioners preferred appeal before the 1^st respondent, the appeal was also dismissed as per Ext.P4 order, confirming the findings in E