SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22345

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1094 OF 2026 | CRMP 4454/2025 | CRL.A NO.216 OF 2025 | MC NO.36 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JELSON J.EDAMPADAM, SHRI.M.FATHAHUDEEN
For the Respondents: SHRI.ASWIN V. NAIR, SHRI. ZAFAR ANTONIO, SHRI.KARTHIK J SEKHAR, SHRI.SHINE N.S, SHRI.RAHUL S.NATH, SR.PP SMT BINDU O V

The court has the authority to conditionally allow a Crl.M.C by imposing payment of maintenance arrears.

Headnote:The petitioner, challenging the orders under Section 528, filed a Crl.M.C. The Magisterial court ordered the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance to his wife and children. After hearing both sides, the court allowed the appeal on condition of paying 50% of the maintenance arrears. The outcome was to restore the MC upon compliance with the payment condition.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges maintenance order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court allows appeal with conditions. (Para 3 , 5 , 6)

O R D E R

(Dated this the 25th day of March, 2026)

The respondent in MC No.36 of 2024 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram, who is the appellant in Crl.A No.216 of 2025 before the Additional Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram, filed this Crl.M.C under Section 528 BNSS, challenging Annexures- 4 and 5 orders.

2. The above MC was filed by the respondent under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. As per Annexure-1 order, the learned Magistrate passed various orders, including a direction to the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.7,000/- to his wife and Rs.1,500/- each to his two minor children. It appears to be an exparte order. The application filed by the petitioner to set aside the exparte order was allowed by the learned Magistrate as per Annexure-2 order with a condition to pay a cost of Rs.3,000/-. Since the petitioner failed to comply the said order, the application to set aside the exparte order was dismissed by the learned Magistrate.

3. As per Annexure-4 order, the learned Magistrate dismissed the application filed by the petitioner for extending time for payment of costs. As per Annexure-5 order, the learned Sessions Judge directed the petitioner to pay 50% of the arrears of maintenance as a condition for staying the execution proceedings.

4. The petition was opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent and he also filed a counter affidavit.

5. The petitioner is not disputing the marriage as well as the paternity of the children. In the above circumstances, he is liable to pay maintenance to his wife and children.

6. After hearing the counsel on both sides, I hold that this Crl.M.C can be allowed in case the petitioner is ready to pay atleast a portion of arrears of maintenance due to his wife and children.

Therefore, this Crl.M.C is allowed on condition that the petitioner shall pay 50% of the arrears of maintenance as ordered by the learned Magistrate till date and continue to pay the same at the above rate. Arrears of 50% of the maintenance till date is to be deposited or paid within a period of one month from today. If the petitioner complies the above condition, the learned Magistrate shall restore the MC and dispose of the same on merits. In case the petitioner fails to comply the above condition, this Crl.M.C will stand dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top