Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22443

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
SIBY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4783 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN
For the Respondents: ADV. OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

A writ petition becomes infructuous when the grounds for it no longer exist, resulting in dismissal.

Headnote:The petition concerning WP

(C) NO. 4783 OF 2024 became infructuous as noted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, leading to its dismissal. The court, upon reviewing the submission, accepted it, resulting in the final ruling of dismissal.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. Submission accepted and this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22443

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JSIBY JOSEPH – AppellantVersusAUTHORISED OFFICER KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – RespondentWP(C) NO. 4783 OF 2024

A writ petition becomes infructuous when the grounds for it no longer exist, resulting in dismissal.

Headnote:The petition concerning WP(C) NO. 4783 OF 2024 became infructuous as noted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, leading to its dismissal. The court, upon reviewing the submission, accepted it, resulting in the final ruling of dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
SIBY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4783 OF 2024

Headnote:The petition concerning WP

(C) NO. 4783 OF 2024 became infructuous as noted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, leading to its dismissal. The court, upon reviewing the submission, accepted it, resulting in the final ruling of dismissal.