Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22546

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
PRINCE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43178 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ANJALI N.
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.ANIRUDHAN, CGC, SMT.K.V.RASHMI, SHRI.G.HARIHARAN, SRI.PRAVEEN.H., SMT.K.S.SMITHA, SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, SMT.B.R.SINDU, SHRI.V.ROHITH, SMT.AFNA V.P.

Court may grant permission to withdraw a writ petition upon request by the petitioner.

Headnote:The petitioners sought permission to withdraw a writ petition

(C) as per the procedural norms. The Court agreed to this request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The court determined the final ruling in context with the procedural aspect of withdrawal under relevant legal provisions.

Table of Content
1. withdrawal of a writ petition (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22546

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMM.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, JPRINCE – AppellantVersusUNION OF INDIA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 43178 OF 2025

Court may grant permission to withdraw a writ petition upon request by the petitioner.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
PRINCE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43178 OF 2025